If research is of a narrow scope, add international or inter-disciplinary context, particularly within the introductory and concluding chapters. Finally, talking about your research and the process of working it into a book can be an essential ingredient to its success. This can be done with your immediate colleagues, at conferences and with a publisher. It can also be done online with social media a useful tool to tap into wider networks as well as to test ideas out. European University Institute (Undated from PhD to book, germano,. From Dissertation to book, thomson,. (2011 can i get a book from my thesis. (2013 turning your PhD Into a book.
Turning thesis into book 2018!
A letter thesis is written for examiners, a book for scholars in general. Anything that is useful only for examiners (e.g. Literature review, methodology discussion) should be cut or heavily amended/digested. Examiners will work through text regardless of the writing style, book readers will not. Therefore, it is likely that extensive re-writing will be required to retain and engage readers. Take a step back. Think about the overall narrative of the book and be prepared to rethink the structure this and can be liberating! Value the readers time. Streamline where possible theses by their nature contain much repetition. Keep in mind the agreed length of the book.
Chapter synopses or abstracts can be used to enhance the metadata around books. Notwithstanding the above, it is useful to start a conversation with an acquisitions/commissioning editor at an early stage toward the end or shortly essay after the completion of a phD. Discussions with supervisors and other colleagues are also very useful at this stage. The next natural step is to submit a book proposal which will be considered by the publisher, often involving a peer review process. Research-level books are often published as part of an established series an awareness of existing books in such series can be useful when it comes to framing and developing a book proposal. Following a review process, the publishers editorial board would give final approval to proceed, following which a book contract would be issued. Armed with publisher and review feedback, the author can then proceed to produce a full manuscript based on their PhD research. Each book is different, but there are numerous key aspects to consider when preparing a final manuscript for book publication. Above all, never lose sight of the audience!
In assessing a proposal for a research-level book, a good publisher will initially ask themselves three questions: Is the scope of the research plan broad enough to be of interest to our readers (scholars globally)? Is the quality sufficiently high? Can the work be developed via feedback from experts as part of the book review process to address any weaknesses? Beyond those core questions, potential authors should also consider significant and ongoing changes to the market for academic books, notably in reader parts behavior. Evolution in digital technology combined with a significant increase in the amounts of available research has led to changes in the way that books are produced, published and propagated. In this environment, the key word is discoverability. Connecting authors to readers requires that publishers facilitate discoverability of research via various routes to ensure that potential readers are able to find books with ease. Authors can aid this process by following a few basic rules of thumb: The main title of the book should position it clearly without reference to other bibliographic information, and should be as short as feasible. Chapter titles should likewise, where possible, position themselves clearly.
Using parts of a phD thesis in a book requires that ongoing and/or collaborative research is being conducted. A book (perhaps co-authored) should be greater than the sum of its constituent parts. Using an aspect of a phD thesis in an edited book on a broader topic ensures that the research fits with related research on a similar theme. A good edited book addresses the need to broaden the scope of PhD-based research via collaborating with a team of contributors. Splitting a phD thesis into several articles for journals hedges a phDs bets by staking smaller amounts of the work in different locations. What is gained by this hedging may be lost in the overall narrative of the PhD research as it is unbundled. The role of the book publisher is to connect authors with readers. When it comes to disseminating research originating from a phD, this relationship is essential. It is therefore useful to consider the perspective of the publisher when considering what publication route to take.
Turning thesis into book
Requests regularly arrive in the author Services inbox asking for advice about turning PhD research into journal articles or books. In this guide, first posted on the. Lse impact Blog, terry Clague from routledge gives a useful insight into what publishers are looking for when they receive new book proposals. Research conducted as part of a phD is valuable. It is valuable for the researcher, who has spent countless hours carrying out the work and it is valuable to those deciding whether the research should result in the award of a phD qualification.
But can the research be valuable to broader audiences? The simple answer is yes at the heart of many successful academic books lies research conducted as part of a phD. In the majority of cases, PhD research is published in the form of journal articles. In some cases, the research is published in a book. Between either end writing of that publishing spectrum there is an array of options to consider when it comes to disseminating PhD research: Converting the entire PhD thesis into a book requires that your thesis covers a topic of interest to a large enough audience. Whereas a thesis starts with a question, a book begins with an answer and communicates its importance in the wider research landscape, tracing its evolution and impact.
Do not repeat your results in the discussion section, instead do the following: Situate your findings in the literature. Discuss how your findings expand the perspective of the field. Briefly present ways in which future studies can build upon your work, and address limitations in your study. Limit number of references. Unlike your thesis, where you can cite those foundational yet potentially dated sources and anything else you may have learned from, journals do sometimes limit the number of citations. For this reason, its important to make sure: to choose the most relevant (and recent) citations.
That the citations are formatted correctly. Pro tip: consider using a reference manager system (e.g. Mendeley ) to make your life easier. When youre picking the most relevant citations or quickly reformatting them, youll be thankful you did. Learn more, the tips presented here are just a short preview of a truly enlightening 60 minutes with an Elsevier publisher, a thesis supervisor and author, and a journals Editor-in-Chief. Be sure to catch the full webinar recording, entirely free, at the, elsevier Researcher Academy. Final tip of the day: following the event, in the researcher Academy mendeley group, the webinar panelists answered the participants most burning questions from the q a be sure to check it out!
How to go about turning my thesis into
Often, there plan is no need for an overly descriptive methods section. While concerns surrounding reproducibility are becoming increasingly important, you may want to keep your methods section succinct and certainly remember your audience: your peers probably do not need every detail of tried and tested methods. A longer description of methods may be a requirement from your institute or funding body, and it is definitely warranted when innovative methods are deployed, but again: its a good idea to use papers previously published in the target journal as examples. Report main findings in results. Be sure to present all the findings that are relevant to your research question(s) in the results section, before the discussion. If you conducted an exploratory analysis, be sure to provide at least a few concise proposal statements on the findings. Ensure discussion is clear and concise. A good starting point for a discussion section is an interpretation of your results: What is it that the reader will have learned from your research?
Lucky for you, you already have a pretty good place to start. While abstracts in journal articles are usually much shorter (100-250 words) than the average thesis introduction, the two have one thing in common: both should contain all the key elements to command the readers attention and encourage them to read further. Using your introduction and part of your discussion as a basis for your abstract can be a good starting point. Modify the introduction, your thesis may have more than one research question or hypothesis, sales which are not all relevant for your paper. Consider combining your research questions or focusing on a single one for the article. Unless otherwise suggested, try to keep the introduction short and to the point. It can also be very helpful to use previously published papers (at least three) from the target journal as examples try to fit in with the usual form for articles in the journal. Tighten the methods section.
when trying to identify a fit for your article. Shorten the length of your thesis. Journal articles are typically much shorter than theses (the precise word limit will normally be stated in the guide for authors so be sure to use a tighter framework and a more compact style. This will mean: Treating your thesis as a separate, new work. Paraphrasing where needed to express the same idea in different ways. Selecting parts of your thesis to repurpose (not all of it) and focusing on the main points you want the reader to understand. Reformat the introduction as an abstract. Writing an abstract can be difficult.
Others, however, are much less obvious. For instance, verbs in a thesis may be in the future i will research and in the past tense i researched. In journal articles, authors tend to describe a study that has already taken place and so tenses are much more consistent. Some other key differences are listed below. Identify the appropriate target journal. Make sure to read the aims and scope of journals you are interested in to be as certain as you can be that your paper falls within the journals scope. If your research falls outside of the aims and scope, look for a more suitable home for your paper as submitting it there would be a wasted effort.
Turning, your, thesis, into, a book
Many first-time authors use the research conducted as part of their PhD or even Masters thesis as a basis for a journal article. While thats a logical step, the requirements for a thesis differ from those of a paper in a peer reviewed academic journal in very significant ways. Ensuring that you are familiar with these can prove the difference between acceptance and rejection. Elseviers, researcher Academy recently hosted a live webinar on turning your PhD thesis into write an article. In this webinar,. Adolfo cuevas, Assistant Professor at Tufts University,. Cecily betz, editor-in-Chief of the. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, and Dawn Nahlen, publisher at Elsevier, discussed eight golden tips to help you transform your thesis into a research paper for publication in a journal. Apples and pears, some of the differences between articles and theses are rather clear consider word limits and the level of detail you should employ in your study.