D., jonathan Wells,. D., linda holloway, and John Altevogt tell the truth about the kansas School boards decision (well, somebody has to!). Defending Darwinism: How Far is too far? Hartwig)Discrimination practices of Scientific American put personal belief over scientific qualifications. Whos really pushing Bad Science? Lerners essay entitled good Science, bad Science in which Lerners thinly veiled prejudice sadly compels him to confuse the two. High Priest of evolution reveals His Religion (Gary. Achtemeier)cites some likely causes for Stephen.
the Black Irish
Evolution: The Creation Myth of Our Culture (D. Buckna)Questions suggested for use to critically examine and evaluate evolution, for classroom discussions or research assignments. The Privileged Planet: Showdown at the Smithsonian (Jerry bergman)relates how (once again) hysterical evo-scientism fundamentalists pressured the Smithsonian (a taxpayer-funded institution) to conform to their dogma alone in its science offerings. National geographic edition —Shoots Itself in the foot—Again! (Bert Thompson and Brad Harrub)rebuts yet another fine example of scholarly defense of evolution. Is the design Explanation Legitimate? Sarfati)discusses criteria to determine design, and whether design is a legitimate explanation for lifes complexity. Origin of Language and Communication (Harrub, Thompson miller)examines the origin of speech language, the anatomical and physiological requirements, and the uniquely human ability to employ speech for communication. Scientific American Refutes Creation (T. Wallace)Commentary on the latest sophomoric scholarship and bigotry invoked by a pillar of American mainstream science. Kansas prompts Anti-Christian reactionary Propaganda paul Ackerman,.
Reappraising the Crown Jewel (Ashby camp)shows that the evidence for the alleged reptile-to-mammal transition (frequently cited as proof of evolution) is much weaker than evolutionists would have one believe. The rise and Fall of skull knm-er 1470 (A.W. Mehlert)Early enthusiasm over this human-like find has been quietly dissipated by new bone-scanning technology, skull 1470 now appearing to be that of an australopithecine. Astronomy top population iii stars and the big Bang Model (Steve miller)explains why the empirical data (i.e., starlight spectra analysis) is a wholesale contradiction of 'big Bang' theory. The dubious Apologetics of Hugh Ross (Danny faulkner)a PhD astronomer and university professor examines the science and Scriptural approach used by ross. The moon: The light that Rules the night (Jonathan Sarfati)a treatment of the earth-moon system and its implications for the creation-evolution debate. General top no evidence that there is enough Time for evolution write (L. Spetner)Dissects faulty assumptions and unsuibstantiated conclusion of Wilf ewens in their claim that there was plenty of time for Darwinian macro-evolution.
Information theory top the Problem of Information (royal Truman)examines Richard Dawkins efforts ( failure) to furnish a plausible evolutionary accounting of the origin of genetic information. Has Tom Schneider really solved It? (royal Truman)thoroughly dismantles Schneiders recent attempt at diffusing evolutionary theorys failure to account for information. . (A rather technicalbut worthwhileread.) Genetic Algorithmsdo they show that evolution Works? (Don Batten)explains why gas are not viable evidence in favor of evolution. Paleontology top the overselling of Whale evolution (Ashby camp)suggests that the fossil evidence for the land mammal-to-whale transition lined is not persuasive, let alone conclusive. National geographics Whale fantasy (Harun Yahya)reveals how the popular science magazine used more dogma than data to tell another evolution tale. On the Alleged Dinosaurian Ancestry of Birds (Ashby camp)examines the fossil evidence vis-vis the ever popular dinosaur-to-bird evolutionary scenario. Smithsonian criticizes National geographics Dino-to-bird Claims in an Open Letter, revealing the lack of consensus on the matter among scientists, despite national geographics sensationalistic propagandizing.
Did God make pathogenic Viruses? (Jerry bergman)explores in detail the function and design of viruses in nature. Second Thoughts About Peppered Moths (Jonathan Wells)The classical story of evolution by natural selection needs revising. Homology in biology a problem for Naturalistic Science (Jonathan Wells)shows how without an empirically demonstrated naturalistic mechanism to account for homology, design remains a possibility deniable only on the basis of questionable philosophical assumptions. Unseating Naturalism: Recent Insights from developmental biology (Jonathan Wells)The evidence produced in developmental biology (embryology) does littleif anythingto support Darwinian claims regarding homology and recapitulation. Pseudogenes: Are They non-Functional? (Pierre jerlström)A synopsis of John woodmorappes recent essay showing how testable and repeatable science is displacing the evolutionary concepts that pseudogenes are nonfunctional and can be used in establishing primate phylogenies. Hox (Homeobox) GenesEvolutions saviour? (Don Batten)Early acclaimed only as evidence in support of evolution, subsequent research has revealed these genes to yield far less hope than evolutionists initially thought.
The, myth of Sisyphus - nyu
Evolutionary Theories on Gender and Sexual Reproduction (Harrub thompson)manifests the shortcomings of evolutionary theories on the origin of sex. B-cell Maturation: An Unsuitable Analogy for neo-darwinian Theory (royal Truman)demonstrates in detail letter why the fine tuning of antibodies in vertebrates is not analogous to neo-darwinian theory (as claimed by some evolutionists and therefore adds no credibility to neo-darwinian theory. Critical Characteristics and the Irreducible Knee joint (Stuart Burgess)demonstrates that the knee could not have evolved but must have been created as a fully functioning limb joint from the beginning of its existence. Is the Inverted Retina really bad Design? Gurney)reveals significant details commonly overlooked by skeptics who cite the human retina as evidence against the Creator, and (therefore) for evolution.
Origin of Life: Instability of building Blocks (Jonathan Sarfati)demonstrates that producing a few chemical building blocks lends far less credibility to the naturalistic origin of life (abiogenesis) hypothesis than popularly imagined. Hydrothermal Origin of Life? (Jonathan Sarfati)demonstrates the logistical weaknesses in the popularly touted hypothesis that life could have arisen in a submarine hydrothermal vent. Why Abiogenesis is Impossible (Jerry bergman)Empirical science fails to lend credibility to the popular evolutionary assumption that life could have arisen as a product of purely natural processes. Atp: The perfect Energy currency for the cell (Jerry bergman)discusses this intricate and complex energy storage mechanism, necessary in its entirety for even the simplest form of life to survive.
(John woodmorappe)examines the credibility of the much-publicized geologic column (and why it always seems to look bigger in print!). Ghost Craters in the sky (Helen Fryman)Lunar geology falls far short of supporting evolutionists belief in.5 billion year old moon. (Condensed from a 1998 presentation. Danny faulkner.) The dating Game (david Plaisted)examines the facts behind radiometric ( other) dating methods cited by evolutionists to prove their million-year scenarios. National geographic joins the dating Game (John woodmorappe) documents the popular-level periodicals most recent effort to blur the distinction between science and evolutionary dogma. Biology top the biology Only makes Sense in Light of evolution Myth (Jerry bergman)—an empirical study and evaluation, citing numerous university-level texts and courses.
Bacterial Resistance an Example evolutionary Change? Kevin Anderson explains how neither horizontal transfer nor mutations corroborate darwinisms predictons. Darwinism and the deterioration of the genome jerry bergman explains how current knowledge of mutations and their effects contradict Darwinisms predictons. Trilobites — the eyes have it (high-level sophistication, that is) Sherwin armitage explore this primitive creatures remarkably complex vision apparatus. The demise of Mitochondrial eve (Harrub thompson)—another myth slain by empirical data (though some evolutionists apparently still cling to this obsolete icon). Homosexuality and the gay gene (Harrub, Thompson miller)debunks popular pseudo-science of the same variety as that used for evolutionary dogma.
The spanking machine: a resilient
Origins: Deception by Omission (Jorge fernandez)documents how Talk. Origins avoids significant details through conspicuous omission and oversimplification. Guest Articles on Related Topics top geology radiometric dating top an Old Earth is the heart of evolution (Jonathan. Henry)documents the arbitrary assumption of an old earth as a vital premise to every facet of evolutionary thought. Assessing Creationist Stratigraphy (Carl Froede john reed)uses evidence from the gulf of Mexico to examine various approaches to stratigraphy within the creation model. Geology and the young Earth (Tas Walker)answers several popular arguments raised entry against a young eartheven by so-called Bible-believing bibliosceptics. The geologic Column: does It Exist?
A scientific Critique of evolution (lee spetner)a response. Edward Maxs TalkOrigins criticisms of the position articulated in Spetners book, not by chance. A continuation of Spetner. Max (lee spetner)response and commentary by Spetner on Ed Maxs additional counter-claims and criticisms at TalkOrigins. The moon is Still young (Malcolm Bowdens)rebuttal of Tim Thompsons attempted dismissal of young age kid arguments involving the earth-moon system. A theory of Creation (T. Wallace)answering the vacuous (but popular, at TalkOrigins) claim that no empirically relevant creationary theory exists.
findings. Helium evidence for a young World overcomes Pressure (Russ Humphreys)rebuts the second edition of kevin Henkes sloppy, unaccountable criticisms of the peer-reviewed rate findings. 29 evidences for Macroevolution (Ashby camp)a thorough critique of douglas Theobalds TalkOrigins essay citing a series of alleged predictions for evolution. Five major evolutionist Misconceptions About evolution (T. Wallace)a response to a nearly fact-free talkOrigins essay of a similar title by mark Isaak. Wallace)a response to Frank Steigers TalkOrigins essays feigning immunity for evolutionism from thermodynamic absolutes. Problems with a global Flood? (Jonathan Sarfati)a rebuttal of Mark Isaaks use of half-baked exegesis and presuppositional bigotry to discredit the flood hypothesis.
Origins newsgroup and the talk. Advocates of evolutionary theory practice evolutionism when they routinely invoke (and dogmatically defend) naturalistic and humanistic philosophical presuppositions, and arbitrarily apply those presuppositions to their interpretation of the available empirical data. . This fact (which many of them zealously deny) severely erodes evolutionists credibility, and effectively disqualifies them from any claim to objectivity in matters concerning origins and science, though much material is published by evolutionists under the pretense that it is the product only of purely. The contributions posted at this site give some expression to the other sidedispelling the two most popular myths perpetuated by most advocates of evolutionism, namely:. The myth that the neo-darwinian macro-evolution belief system—as heavily popularized by todays self-appointed science plan experts, the popular media, academia, and certain government agencies—finds overwhelming or even merely unequivocal support in the data of empirical science. The myth that the alternativebiblical creationsomehow fails to find any compelling, corroborative support in the same data The question of origins is plainly a matter of science history —not the domain of applied science. . Contrary to the unilateral denials of many evolutionists, ones worldview does indeed play heavily on ones interpretation of scientific data, a phenomenon that is magnified in matters concerning origins, where neither repeatability, nor observation, nor measurement— the three immutable elements of the scientific method —may. Many proponents of evolutionism nevertheless persist in claiming exclusive scientific status for their popularized beliefs, while heaping out-of-hand dismissal and derision upon all doubters, spurning the very advice of Darwin himself. This site is one answer to such unreasonableand unscientificpractices.
Myth, in popular culture
Whats New: evolutionists Confusion over Mutations and Information Put to rest — lee Spetner rebuts more misinformed and easily demolished 'refutations'. not Enough Time for evolution. Lee spetner explains the failure of Wilf ewens shredder to make a cogent case. evolution as Creation Myth, several thoughtful questions for teachers students (and every one else, for that matter). biology relies on evolution? A myth belied by university- level texts course content. Ashby camps ever-growing list of 1460 web articles—the cream of the crop—supporting creation challenging evolution. Quick links: About TrueOrigin: TrueOrigin faq, q A he TrueOrigin Archive comprises an intellectually honest response to what in fairness can only be described as evolutionism —the doctrine of strict philosophical naturalism as a necessary presupposition in matters of science history (. This doctrine is abundantly evident in much material advocating the neo-darwinian macro-evolution origins model, including—but not limited to—the talk.